logo

pleroma

My custom branche(s) on git.pleroma.social/pleroma/pleroma git clone https://hacktivis.me/git/pleroma.git
commit: ee3052a2d8fda37e27f31c8d824ce7ac174b993c
parent d65e6e152acd772bd75435619a36accfec86555f
Author: lain <lain@soykaf.club>
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 14:20:19 +0200

ActivityPub: Return Announces when filtering by `following`.

Diffstat:

Mlib/pleroma/web/activity_pub/activity_pub.ex12+++++++++++-
Mtest/web/activity_pub/activity_pub_test.exs80+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 91 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/lib/pleroma/web/activity_pub/activity_pub.ex b/lib/pleroma/web/activity_pub/activity_pub.ex @@ -790,7 +790,17 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.ActivityPub do [activity, object] in query, where: fragment( - "?->>'inReplyTo' is null OR ? && array_remove(?, ?) OR ? = ?", + """ + ?->>'type' != 'Create' -- This isn't a Create + OR ?->>'inReplyTo' is null -- this isn't a reply + OR ? && array_remove(?, ?) -- The recipient is us or one of our friends, + -- unless they are the author (because authors + -- are also part of the recipients). This leads + -- to a bug that self-replies by friends won't + -- show up. + OR ? = ? -- The actor is us + """, + activity.data, object.data, ^[user.ap_id | User.get_cached_user_friends_ap_ids(user)], activity.recipients, diff --git a/test/web/activity_pub/activity_pub_test.exs b/test/web/activity_pub/activity_pub_test.exs @@ -2177,4 +2177,84 @@ defmodule Pleroma.Web.ActivityPub.ActivityPubTest do assert user.nickname == orig_user.nickname end end + + describe "reply filtering" do + test "`following` still contains announcements by friends" do + user = insert(:user) + followed = insert(:user) + not_followed = insert(:user) + + User.follow(user, followed) + + {:ok, followed_post} = CommonAPI.post(followed, %{status: "Hello"}) + + {:ok, not_followed_to_followed} = + CommonAPI.post(not_followed, %{ + status: "Also hello", + in_reply_to_status_id: followed_post.id + }) + + {:ok, retoot} = CommonAPI.repeat(not_followed_to_followed.id, followed) + + params = + %{} + |> Map.put(:type, ["Create", "Announce"]) + |> Map.put(:blocking_user, user) + |> Map.put(:muting_user, user) + |> Map.put(:reply_filtering_user, user) + |> Map.put(:reply_visibility, "following") + |> Map.put(:announce_filtering_user, user) + |> Map.put(:user, user) + + activities = + [user.ap_id | User.following(user)] + |> ActivityPub.fetch_activities(params) + + followed_post_id = followed_post.id + retoot_id = retoot.id + + assert [%{id: ^followed_post_id}, %{id: ^retoot_id}] = activities + + assert length(activities) == 2 + end + + # This test is skipped because, while this is the desired behavior, + # there seems to be no good way to achieve it with the method that + # we currently use for detecting to who a reply is directed. + # This is a TODO and should be fixed by a later rewrite of the code + # in question. + @tag skip: true + test "`following` still contains self-replies by friends" do + user = insert(:user) + followed = insert(:user) + not_followed = insert(:user) + + User.follow(user, followed) + + {:ok, followed_post} = CommonAPI.post(followed, %{status: "Hello"}) + {:ok, not_followed_post} = CommonAPI.post(not_followed, %{status: "Also hello"}) + + {:ok, _followed_to_not_followed} = + CommonAPI.post(followed, %{status: "sup", in_reply_to_status_id: not_followed_post.id}) + + {:ok, _followed_self_reply} = + CommonAPI.post(followed, %{status: "Also cofe", in_reply_to_status_id: followed_post.id}) + + params = + %{} + |> Map.put(:type, ["Create", "Announce"]) + |> Map.put(:blocking_user, user) + |> Map.put(:muting_user, user) + |> Map.put(:reply_filtering_user, user) + |> Map.put(:reply_visibility, "following") + |> Map.put(:announce_filtering_user, user) + |> Map.put(:user, user) + + activities = + [user.ap_id | User.following(user)] + |> ActivityPub.fetch_activities(params) + + assert length(activities) == 2 + end + end end