commit: d521096f6075690f867d870b6fa5ddac51610a63
parent 3c9c906ebec8d63884108618cc2f8322a1712e12
Author: András Németh <sun.arch.code@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jul 2023 16:51:47 +0200
Commons Clause will destroy OSS: Typo fixes
Diffstat:
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/content/blog/Commons-clause-will-destroy-open-source.md b/content/blog/Commons-clause-will-destroy-open-source.md
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ before we criticise his solution to it. I would be happy to share my thoughts.
I've struggled for many years to find a way to finance myself as the maintainer
of many dozens of projects. For a long time it has been a demotivating struggle
with no clear solutions, a struggle which at one point probably left me
-vulnerable to the temptations offered by the Common Clause. But today, the
+vulnerable to the temptations offered by the Commons Clause. But today, the
situation is clearly improving.
Personally, I have a harder go of it because very little of my open source
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ personally referenced it dozens of times. Thank you, honestly, for your work on
improving the legal landscape of open source. With Commons Clause, however,
Kevin has taken it too far. [The four
freedoms](https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html) are *important*. The
-only solution is to bury the Common Clause project. Kill the website and GitHub
+only solution is to bury the Commons Clause project. Kill the website and GitHub
repository, and we can try to forget this ever happened.
I understand that turning back is going to be hard, which scares me. I know that
