commit: 924e2a98a594dbc31e3ec75e680b7c2b337cf1a6
parent 6fa5a0ffed5cc783a92f9eb4394dcaa7538575e6
Author: Oliver Leaver-Smith <oliver@leaversmith.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 21:36:32 +0000
Correct link to alps
Diffstat:
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/content/blog/Mail-service-provider-recommendations.md b/content/blog/Mail-service-provider-recommendations.md
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ for a mail service provider.
advertise.
Full disclosure: SourceHut and Migadu agreed to a consulting arrangement to
-build their [new webmail system](https://git.sr.ht/~emersion/alps), which should
+build their [new webmail system](https://git.sr.ht/~migadu/alps), which should
be going into production soon. However, I had evaluated and started recommending
Migadu prior to the start of this project, and I believe that Migadu fares well
under the criteria I give at the end of this post.
@@ -115,5 +115,5 @@ If you represent a mail service provider which you believe meets this criteria,
please [send me an email](mailto:sir@cmpwn.com).
[^1]: This also rules out ProtonMail and Tutanota, doubly damning them, especially because it provides an excuse for skipping IMAP and SMTP, which conveniently enables vendor lock-in.
-[^2]: This rules out Fastmail because of their government (Australlia)'s hostile and subversive laws regarding encryption.
+[^2]: This rules out Fastmail because of their government (Australia)'s hostile and subversive laws regarding encryption.
[^3]: Alarmingly rare, this one. It seems to be either this, or a captcha like mailbox.org does. I would be interested in seeing the use of client-side proof of work, or requiring someone to enter their payment details and successfully complete a charge instead.
