drewdevault.com

Open-letter-to-Senator-Casey.md (3977B)

---
date: 2020-03-07
title: An open letter to Senator Bob Casey on end-to-end encryption
layout: post
---
To Senator Bob Casey, I'm writing this open letter.
As your constituent, someone who voted for you in 2018, and an expert in
software technology, I am disappointed in your support of the EARN IT Act. I am
aware that encryption is a challenging technology to understand, even for us
software engineers, and that it raises difficult problems for the legislature.
The EARN IT Act does not protect our children, and it has grave implications for
the freedoms of our citizens.
The mathematics underlying strong end-to-end encryption have been proven to be
unbreakable. Asking service providers to solve them or stop using it is akin to
forcing us to solve time travel or quit recording history. Banning the use of a
technology without first accomplishing a sisyphean task is equivalent to banning
the technology outright. Ultimately, these efforts are expensive and futile. The
technology necessary to implement unbreakable encryption can be described
succinctly on a single 8.5"x11" sheet of paper. I would be happy to send such a
paper to your office, if you wish. The cat is out of the bag: encryption is not
a secret, and its use to protect our citizens is a widespread industry standard.
Attempting to ban it is equivalent to trying to ban algebra or trigonometry.
Citizen use of end-to-end encryption is necessary to uphold our national
security. One way that child abuse material is often shared is via the Tor
secure internet network. This system utilizes strong end-to-end encryption to
secure the communications of its users, which makes it well-suited to hiding
the communications of child abusers. However, the same guarantees that enable
the child abusers to securely share materials are also essential for
journalists, activists, watchdog groups - and for our national security. The
technology behind Tor was designed by the US Navy and DARPA and the ability for
the public to use it to secure their communications is essential to the
network's ability to delivery on its national security guarantees as well.
Protecting our children is important, but this move doesn't help. Breaking
end-to-end encryption is no substitute for good police work and effective
courts. Banning end-to-end encryption isn't going to make it go away - the
smart criminals are still going to use it to cover their tracks, and law
enforcement still needs to be prepared to solve cases with strong encryption
involved. Even on the Tor network, where strong end-to-end encryption is
utilized, many child abusers have been caught and brought to justice thanks to
good investigative work. It's often difficult to conduct an investigation within
the limits of the law and with respect to the rights of our citizens, but it's
necessary for law enforcement to endure this difficulty to protect our freedom.
End-to-end encryption represents an important tool for the preservation of our
fundamental rights, as enshrined in the bill of rights. Time and again, our
alleged representatives levy attacks on this essential technology. It doesn't
get any less important each time it's attacked - rather, the opposite seems to
be true. On the face of it, the EARN IT Act appears to use important and morally
compelling problems of child abuse as a front for an attack on end-to-end
encryption. Using child abuse as a front to attack our fundamental right to
privacy is reprehensible, and I'm sure that you'll reconsider your position.
As freedom of the press is an early signal for the failure of democracy and rise
of tyranny, so holds for the right to encrypt. I am an American, I am free to
speak my mind. I am free to solve a simple mathematical equation which
guarantees that my thoughts are shared only with those I choose. The right to
private communications is essential to a functioning democracy, and if you claim
to represent the American people, you must work to defend that right.